(no subject)

[techdragon]

As is typical in LJ land...a debate has errupted on altparent in regards to circumcision. People get heated up over this- most of the norm is considering it totally body mutilation and abuse to a young child. One person even is quoted to say "NO way! Just looking at a cut penis should tell you that it's wrong. ". That comment really made me think.... (though this is a topic I like to think about). I happen to find both styles pleasing. So I as you, dear readers to add your opinions (and what is a paid account for besides weird polls and lots of user pics). For those of you at work I have tried to keep the language fairly PC but will put the poll behind a cut (hahaha!)


[Poll #734541]

(the last question (#7) can also relate as to why you would get your own son done or not) :)


[EDIT: The problem with polls is that you can not edit them after the fact and it is a guarantee that there will be some kind of mistake or oops! involved. Just work around the awkwardness of the poll, please... I didn't think all tha linear when I wrote it out in the heat of frustration :) ]

Comments

Re: But.

[bitterdessa.livejournal.com]

I've had considerably more experience with uncircumcised men then circumcised men, and I perfer circumcised men. For me it's not exactly an aesthetic concearn, since I sort of think all cocks are giggle-inducing; it's more of a pratical concearn. It's easier for me to put condoms on circumcised penises and it's a more pleasant oral sex-giving experience.

There's also the possible link between uncircumcised men, HPV and cervical cancer: American Cancer Society:
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS_1_1x_New_Study_Shows_Benefit_of_Male_Circumcision.asp